May 9, 2014
Measuring the value of Crosby, Getzlaf, and Giroux to their teams
Last week, the Hart Memorial Trophy candidates were announced. According to the infallible internet, it’s likely that Crosby will win — but let’s figure out if that’s true. To get the obvious stats out of the way, Crosby (36G, 68A, 80GP), Getzlaf (31G, 56A, 77GP), and Giroux(28G, 58A, 82GP) finished first, second, and third in scoring this year, with points-per-games of 1.30, 1.13, and 1.05, respectively. Pittsburgh, Anaheim, and Philadelphia finished with 242, 263, and 233 goals, respectively. Since the Hart looks at a player’s value to his team, it makes sense to look at his contributions to the team’s overall scoring.
Looking at points alone, Crosby has a pretty huge head start over the other two. Now, the Hart (allegedly) isn’t the Art Ross 2.0, so it makes sense for us to look at possession statistics and the some frequencies from association rule mining.
Team | Strength | Candidate | Corsi % | Fenwick % | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pittsburgh | All | On | 0.6036322 | 0.6095969 | |
Pittsburgh | All | Off | 0.4225558 | 0.4267751 | |
Anaheim | All | On | 0.5423348 | 0.5500000 | |
Anaheim | All | Off | 0.4812510 | 0.4914966 | |
Philadelphia | All | On | 0.5998837 | 0.5955325 | |
Philadelphia | All | Off | 0.4552777 | 0.4539683 | |
Pittsburgh | Even | On | 0.5308595 | 0.5372152 | |
Pittsburgh | Even | Off | 0.4638907 | 0.4685562 | |
Anaheim | Even | On | 0.5193694 | 0.5249392 | |
Anaheim | Even | Off | 0.4928212 | 0.4995057 | |
Philadelphia | Even | On | 0.5437117 | 0.5356383 | |
Philadelphia | Even | Off | 0.4811052 | 0.4763085 |
You may have noticed that Crosby and Giroux have a larger impact on the ice for their team than Getzlaf. These differences become much clearer when they’re visualized.
At this point it becomes clear that if there’s any competition, it’s between Crosby and Giroux. While all of the players improve their teams’ performances, it’s obvious that Getzlaf’s relative contribution is not as strong as either of the other two.
Looking deeper, the Fenwick percentage at even-strength tilts the odds further towards Crosby and quite a bit farther away from Getzlaf. The next combination of graphs compares the game-by-game Fenwick.

Blue and red lines represent season averages with and without the player on the ice, respectively. Black lines are the team average.
Two things to notice here: (1) Pittsburgh’s possession stats with Crosby are higher than Philadelphia’s with Giroux; and (2) Pittsburgh possession stats without Crosby are lower than Philadelphia’s without Giroux. This is especially evident when you look at the gaps between points — Giroux is very good, but Crosby absolutely lifts his team. This caught me a bit off guard, since until I wrote this post I hadn’t noticed that Pittsburgh finished the regular season with Corsi and Fenwick percentages below 0.500.
When we look at association rules, we the same story being told, albeit in a different manner.
Rank | Player | Event | Support | Confidence |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Any | Shot for | 0.155 | 0.155 |
2 | Any | Shot against | 0.149 | 0.149 |
3 | Any | Hit for | 0.137 | 0.137 |
4 | Any | Hit against | 0.133 | 0.133 |
5 | Any | Block for | 0.075 | 0.075 |
6 | Sidney Crosby | Shot for | 0.073 | 0.201 |
7 | Any | Block against | 0.069 | 0.069 |
8 | Any | They miss | 0.062 | 0.062 |
9 | Chris Kunitz | Shot for | 0.062 | 0.201 |
10 | Matt Niskanen | Shot for | 0.061 | 0.178 |
Rank | Player | Event | Support | Confidence |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Any | Shot against | 0.150 | 0.150 |
2 | Any | Shot for | 0.149 | 0.149 |
3 | Any | Hit for | 0.130 | 0.130 |
4 | Any | Hit against | 0.125 | 0.125 |
5 | Any | Block against | 0.077 | 0.077 |
6 | Any | Block for | 0.072 | 0.072 |
7 | Claude Giroux | Shot for | 0.064 | 0.188 |
8 | Braydon Coburn | Shot against | 0.061 | 0.175 |
9 | Any | We miss | 0.060 | 0.060 |
10 | Jakub Voracek | Shot for | 0.057 | 0.200 |
The main takeaway from Crosby’s table is how high up his generation of offense is — about 7.3% of all active events in the game are a Pittsburgh shot on goal while he’s on the ice, and when he’s on the ice, there’s 20.1% chance that the active event will be a Pittsburgh shot hitting the net. In fact, Crosby was on the ice for a Pittsburgh shot on goal more often than any player was on the ice for an opponent having their shot blocked. Crosby’s linemate Kunitz is only on for 6.4% of Pittsburgh’s shots, so that suggests that Crosby is doing quite a bit on his own. (As a note, you’ll see similar stuff for players like Erik Karlsson, who tend to be head and shoulders above their teammates, even if their teammates are very skilled on their own.)
What’s the conclusion here? In terms of relative contributions to their teams, this is a race between Crosby and Giroux — one that Crosby will very probably win.